Pay vs Place

Amber Valley vs Manchester: buying or renting a home

A typical terraced house costs £91,000 (55%) more in Manchester than in Amber Valley. Measured against local pay, buying is harder in Manchester: it takes 7.1× median annual pay, against 4.4× in Amber Valley.

Amber Valley, terraced
£165,000
Income typically needed: £33,000
Median full-time pay: £37,756
Manchester, terraced
£256,000
Income typically needed: £51,000
Median full-time pay: £36,278

At a glance

Amber Valley Manchester
Buying a home Fairly affordable Fairly affordable
Renting a home Fairly affordable Very expensive
Recorded crime About average High

Buying rates the typical price of all homes against median pay; renting rates a year of average rent against median pay; crime rates recorded crime per resident against the England and Wales average.

What the numbers say

Median full-time pay in Manchester (£36,278) is 4% lower than in Amber Valley (£37,756), while a typical terraced house costs 55% more (£256,000 against £165,000). Set against local pay, Amber Valley is the easier of the two for a typical earner to buy in.

Buying a terraced house takes 4.4× annual pay in Amber Valley and 7.1× in Manchester. Renting one takes 25% of pay in Amber Valley and 46% in Manchester. Both are harder in Manchester, and the gap is wider for renting.

Across all property types and measured against pay, Amber Valley is the 59th least expensive of 316 areas to buy in, and Manchester is around the middle of 316 areas (188th most expensive). For renting against pay, Amber Valley is the 39th least expensive of 316 areas and Manchester is the 46th most expensive of 316 areas.

Someone on £40,000 in Amber Valley would need about £62,000 in Manchester to be equally placed to buy a terraced house, and about £73,000 to be equally placed to rent one. Keeping the same pay after a move to Manchester would leave you worse placed to buy. These figures compare housing costs only; they ignore other living costs and the pay you could earn in a new job.

Police recorded 68.3 crimes per 1,000 residents in Amber Valley and 142.7 in Manchester, so recorded crime per resident in Manchester is 2.1 times the rate in Amber Valley. The biggest difference is in vehicle offences: 2.5 per 1,000 in Amber Valley against 7.9 in Manchester.

Can a typical earner buy?

Terraced house Amber Valley Manchester
Median full-time pay £37,756 £36,278
House price ÷ pay 4.4× 7.1×
Median pay as a share of income typically needed to buy 114% 71%
Rent a year as a share of median pay 25% 46%

Buying, by property type

Type Amber Valley Manchester Difference
Detached £337,750 £400,000 +18% in Manchester
Semi-detached £212,750 £310,000 +46% in Manchester
Terraced £165,000 £256,000 +55% in Manchester

Renting, by property type

Type (average rent a month) Amber Valley Manchester Difference
Detached £1,061 £1,878 +77% in Manchester
Semi-detached £843 £1,496 +77% in Manchester
Terraced £771 £1,405 +82% in Manchester

Crime

Police recorded 68.3 crimes per 1,000 residents in Amber Valley and 142.7 in Manchester, so recorded crime per resident in Manchester is 2.1 times the rate in Amber Valley.

Police recorded crime per 1,000 residents Amber Valley Manchester Difference
All recorded crime (excluding fraud) 68.3 142.7 +109% in Manchester
Violence against the person 30.4 51.9 +71% in Manchester
Sexual offences 3.2 5.6 +78% in Manchester
Robbery 0.5 2.7 +433% in Manchester
Residential burglary (per 1,000 households) 3.5 9.3 +165% in Manchester
Vehicle offences 2.5 7.9 +221% in Manchester
Theft from the person 0.4 3.9 +937% in Manchester
Criminal damage and arson 6.8 10.0 +48% in Manchester

Rates use resident population, so city centres and student areas show higher crime per resident than residents experience. Recorded crime also depends on reporting and police recording practice.

How prices have changed in each area

Average house price for all property types, indexed so that 2005 is 100. A line at 200 means prices have doubled.

Amber Valley: 187Manchester: 251
House prices in Amber Valley and Manchester since 2005, indexed so that 2005 is 100Prices indexed to 2005 = 100. Amber Valley now 187, Manchester now 251.5010015020025030020052010201520202025House prices in Amber Valley and Manchester since 2005, indexed so that 2005 is 100Prices indexed to 2005 = 100. Amber Valley now 187, Manchester now 251.5010015020025030020102020
Show the figures
YearAmber ValleyManchester
2005100100
2006106117
2007114129
2008109125
200998112
2010103115
201199114
2012100115
2013103115
2014109125
2015114133
2016119145
2017125158
2018131167
2019135173
2020141178
2021155209
2022168231
2023174233
2024174241
2025182247
12 months to July 2026187251

In 2005 the average home cost £124,847 in Amber Valley and £100,202 in Manchester. Now it is £232,866 and £251,205: Amber Valley is up 87% and Manchester is up 151%. Prices have risen faster in Manchester, so the gap between the two has narrowed.

Buying a home against local pay, over time

Average house price divided by median full-time pay. Higher means harder to afford.

Amber Valley: 6.0 years of payManchester: 6.8 years of pay
Years of median pay needed to buy the average home in Amber Valley and ManchesterAmber Valley now 6.0, Manchester now 6.8 years of pay.0×2×4×6×8×20052010201520202025Years of median pay needed to buy the average home in Amber Valley and ManchesterAmber Valley now 6.0, Manchester now 6.8 years of pay.0×2×4×6×8×20052010201520202025
Show the figures
YearAmber ValleyManchester
20055.5 years of pay4.8 years of pay
20105.2 years of pay5.0 years of pay
20155.3 years of pay5.4 years of pay
20205.2 years of pay6.3 years of pay
20256.0 years of pay6.8 years of pay

In 2005 a home cost 5.5 years of pay in Amber Valley and 4.8 years in Manchester. In 2025 it was 6.0 years and 6.8 years.

Affordability has worsened more in Manchester over that time.

How rents have changed in each area

Average monthly rent for all property types, indexed so that 2015 is 100.

Amber Valley: 156Manchester: 174
Rents in Amber Valley and Manchester since 2015, indexed so that 2015 is 100Rents indexed to 2015 = 100. Amber Valley now 156, Manchester now 174.100120140160180201620182020202220242026Rents in Amber Valley and Manchester since 2015, indexed so that 2015 is 100Rents indexed to 2015 = 100. Amber Valley now 156, Manchester now 174.100120140160180201520202025
Show the figures
YearAmber ValleyManchester
2015100100
2016101101
2017104106
2018106112
2019109114
2020110117
2021113120
2022118127
2023130139
2024139156
2025149167
August 2026156174

In 2015 the average rent was £513 a month in Amber Valley and £790 in Manchester. Now it is £799 and £1,373: up 56% in Amber Valley and up 74% in Manchester. Rents have risen faster in Manchester.

What your salary is worth in each area

Salary needed to afford the same kind of home (terraced), going by median prices and average rents.

Moving from Amber Valley to Manchester

Earning in Amber Valley Equivalent to buy in Manchester Equivalent to rent in Manchester
£30,000 £46,500 £54,500
£40,000 £62,000 £73,000
£50,000 £77,500 £91,000
£60,000 £93,000 £109,500

Moving from Manchester to Amber Valley

Earning in Manchester Equivalent to buy in Amber Valley Equivalent to rent in Amber Valley
£30,000 £19,500 £16,500
£40,000 £26,000 £22,000
£50,000 £32,000 £27,500
£60,000 £38,500 £33,000
Prices are medians for each property type over the last 12 months of registered sales; types with fewer than 100 sales in either area are left out. Rents are ONS averages for the area. Pay is the median for full-time employees living in the area, before tax. Income needed is illustrative: it assumes a 10% deposit and a lender willing to lend 4.5 times income. Real lending depends on your circumstances. Salary equivalents compare housing costs only, not other living costs, tax or the pay you could earn in a new job.

All Amber Valley figures · All Manchester figures