Pay vs Place

Birmingham vs Wolverhampton: buying or renting a home

A typical terraced house costs £25,000 (13%) more in Birmingham than in Wolverhampton. Measured against local pay, buying is harder in Birmingham: it takes 6.1× median annual pay, against 5.4× in Wolverhampton.

Birmingham, terraced
£220,000
Income typically needed: £44,000
Median full-time pay: £35,989
Wolverhampton, terraced
£195,000
Income typically needed: £39,000
Median full-time pay: £35,858

At a glance

Birmingham Wolverhampton
Buying a home Fairly affordable Fairly affordable
Renting a home Expensive Fairly affordable
Recorded crime Above average About average

Buying rates the typical price of all homes against median pay; renting rates a year of average rent against median pay; crime rates recorded crime per resident against the England and Wales average.

What the numbers say

Median full-time pay in Wolverhampton (£35,858) is the same than in Birmingham (£35,989), while a typical terraced house costs 11% less (£195,000 against £220,000). Set against local pay, Wolverhampton is the easier of the two for a typical earner to buy in.

Buying a terraced house takes 6.1× annual pay in Birmingham and 5.4× in Wolverhampton. Renting one takes 37% of pay in Birmingham and 32% in Wolverhampton. Both are harder in Birmingham, and the gap is wider for renting.

Across all property types and measured against pay, Birmingham is the 108th least expensive of 316 areas to buy in, and Wolverhampton is the 80th least expensive of 316 areas. For renting against pay, Birmingham is the 112th most expensive of 316 areas and Wolverhampton is around the middle of 316 areas (175th most expensive).

Someone on £40,000 in Birmingham would need about £35,500 in Wolverhampton to be equally placed to buy a terraced house, and about £34,500 to be equally placed to rent one. Keeping the same pay after a move to Wolverhampton would leave you better placed to buy. These figures compare housing costs only; they ignore other living costs and the pay you could earn in a new job.

Police recorded 114.2 crimes per 1,000 residents in Birmingham and 92.0 in Wolverhampton, so recorded crime per resident is 19% lower in Wolverhampton. The biggest difference is in residential burglary: 11.7 per 1,000 in Birmingham against 5.1 in Wolverhampton.

Can a typical earner buy?

Terraced house Birmingham Wolverhampton
Median full-time pay £35,989 £35,858
House price ÷ pay 6.1× 5.4×
Median pay as a share of income typically needed to buy 82% 92%
Rent a year as a share of median pay 37% 32%

Buying, by property type

Type Birmingham Wolverhampton Difference
Detached £452,500 £325,000 -28% in Wolverhampton
Semi-detached £265,000 £230,000 -13% in Wolverhampton
Terraced £220,000 £195,000 -11% in Wolverhampton
Flat £145,000 £115,000 -21% in Wolverhampton

Renting, by property type

Type (average rent a month) Birmingham Wolverhampton Difference
Detached £1,434 £1,274 -11% in Wolverhampton
Semi-detached £1,151 £1,001 -13% in Wolverhampton
Terraced £1,095 £944 -14% in Wolverhampton
Flat £919 £737 -20% in Wolverhampton

Crime

Police recorded 114.2 crimes per 1,000 residents in Birmingham and 92.0 in Wolverhampton, so recorded crime per resident is 19% lower in Wolverhampton.

Police recorded crime per 1,000 residents Birmingham Wolverhampton Difference
All recorded crime (excluding fraud) 114.2 92.0 -19% in Wolverhampton
Violence against the person 46.1 38.6 -16% in Wolverhampton
Sexual offences 4.8 3.5 -27% in Wolverhampton
Robbery 3.1 1.2 -62% in Wolverhampton
Residential burglary (per 1,000 households) 11.7 5.1 -57% in Wolverhampton
Vehicle offences 10.2 7.6 -25% in Wolverhampton
Theft from the person 1.3 0.7 -42% in Wolverhampton
Criminal damage and arson 9.1 7.8 -14% in Wolverhampton

Rates use resident population, so city centres and student areas show higher crime per resident than residents experience. Recorded crime also depends on reporting and police recording practice.

How prices have changed in each area

Average house price for all property types, indexed so that 2005 is 100. A line at 200 means prices have doubled.

Birmingham: 179Wolverhampton: 185
House prices in Birmingham and Wolverhampton since 2005, indexed so that 2005 is 100Prices indexed to 2005 = 100. Birmingham now 179, Wolverhampton now 185.7510012515017520020052010201520202025House prices in Birmingham and Wolverhampton since 2005, indexed so that 2005 is 100Prices indexed to 2005 = 100. Birmingham now 179, Wolverhampton now 185.7510012515017520020102020
Show the figures
YearBirminghamWolverhampton
2005100100
2006104107
2007109114
2008105109
20099598
2010100100
20119798
20129898
201310099
2014106101
2015111103
2016120111
2017129117
2018136124
2019140129
2020142133
2021157146
2022172164
2023174169
2024174172
2025178180
12 months to July 2026179185

In 2005 the average home cost £130,237 in Birmingham and £115,583 in Wolverhampton. Now it is £232,548 and £213,421: Birmingham is up 79% and Wolverhampton is up 85%. Prices have risen faster in Wolverhampton, so the gap between the two has narrowed.

Buying a home against local pay, over time

Average house price divided by median full-time pay. Higher means harder to afford.

Birmingham: 6.5 years of payWolverhampton: 5.8 years of pay
Years of median pay needed to buy the average home in Birmingham and WolverhamptonBirmingham now 6.5, Wolverhampton now 5.8 years of pay.0×2×4×6×8×20052010201520202025Years of median pay needed to buy the average home in Birmingham and WolverhamptonBirmingham now 6.5, Wolverhampton now 5.8 years of pay.0×2×4×6×8×20052010201520202025
Show the figures
YearBirminghamWolverhampton
20056.1 years of pay5.8 years of pay
20105.5 years of pay5.4 years of pay
20155.8 years of pay5.2 years of pay
20206.3 years of pay6.0 years of pay
20256.5 years of pay5.8 years of pay

In 2005 a home cost 6.1 years of pay in Birmingham and 5.8 years in Wolverhampton. In 2025 it was 6.5 years and 5.8 years.

How rents have changed in each area

Average monthly rent for all property types, indexed so that 2015 is 100.

Birmingham: 161Wolverhampton: 173
Rents in Birmingham and Wolverhampton since 2015, indexed so that 2015 is 100Rents indexed to 2015 = 100. Birmingham now 161, Wolverhampton now 173.100120140160180201620182020202220242026Rents in Birmingham and Wolverhampton since 2015, indexed so that 2015 is 100Rents indexed to 2015 = 100. Birmingham now 161, Wolverhampton now 173.100120140160180201520202025
Show the figures
YearBirminghamWolverhampton
2015100100
2016105101
2017108103
2018111104
2019113108
2020116112
2021118117
2022122125
2023132132
2024147144
2025156156
August 2026161173

In 2015 the average rent was £682 a month in Birmingham and £547 in Wolverhampton. Now it is £1,099 and £945: up 61% in Birmingham and up 73% in Wolverhampton. Rents have risen faster in Wolverhampton.

What your salary is worth in each area

Salary needed to afford the same kind of home (terraced), going by median prices and average rents.

Moving from Birmingham to Wolverhampton

Earning in Birmingham Equivalent to buy in Wolverhampton Equivalent to rent in Wolverhampton
£30,000 £26,500 £26,000
£40,000 £35,500 £34,500
£50,000 £44,500 £43,000
£60,000 £53,000 £51,500

Moving from Wolverhampton to Birmingham

Earning in Wolverhampton Equivalent to buy in Birmingham Equivalent to rent in Birmingham
£30,000 £34,000 £35,000
£40,000 £45,000 £46,500
£50,000 £56,500 £58,000
£60,000 £67,500 £69,500
Prices are medians for each property type over the last 12 months of registered sales; types with fewer than 100 sales in either area are left out. Rents are ONS averages for the area. Pay is the median for full-time employees living in the area, before tax. Income needed is illustrative: it assumes a 10% deposit and a lender willing to lend 4.5 times income. Real lending depends on your circumstances. Salary equivalents compare housing costs only, not other living costs, tax or the pay you could earn in a new job.

All Birmingham figures · All Wolverhampton figures