Pay vs Place

Birmingham vs Camden: buying or renting a home

A typical terraced house costs £1,380,000 (627%) more in Camden than in Birmingham. Measured against local pay, buying is harder in Camden: it takes 30.1× median annual pay, against 6.1× in Birmingham.

Birmingham, terraced
£220,000
Income typically needed: £44,000
Median full-time pay: £35,989
Camden, terraced
£1,600,000
Income typically needed: £320,000
Median full-time pay: £53,133

At a glance

Birmingham Camden
Buying a home Fairly affordable Very expensive
Renting a home Expensive Very expensive
Recorded crime Above average High

Buying rates the typical price of all homes against median pay; renting rates a year of average rent against median pay; crime rates recorded crime per resident against the England and Wales average.

What the numbers say

Median full-time pay in Camden (£53,133) is 48% higher than in Birmingham (£35,989), while a typical terraced house costs 627% more (£1,600,000 against £220,000). Set against local pay, Birmingham is the easier of the two for a typical earner to buy in.

Buying a terraced house takes 6.1× annual pay in Birmingham and 30.1× in Camden. Renting one takes 37% of pay in Birmingham and 77% in Camden. Both are harder in Camden, and the gap is wider for buying.

Across all property types and measured against pay, Birmingham is the 108th least expensive of 316 areas to buy in, and Camden is the 5th most expensive of 316 areas. For renting against pay, Birmingham is the 112th most expensive of 316 areas and Camden is the 6th most expensive of 316 areas.

Someone on £40,000 in Birmingham would need about £291,000 in Camden to be equally placed to buy a terraced house, and about £125,500 to be equally placed to rent one. Keeping the same pay after a move to Camden would leave you worse placed to buy. These figures compare housing costs only; they ignore other living costs and the pay you could earn in a new job.

Police recorded 114.2 crimes per 1,000 residents in Birmingham and 173.3 in Camden, so recorded crime per resident is 52% higher in Camden. The biggest difference is in violence against the person: 46.1 per 1,000 in Birmingham against 34.4 in Camden. Camden's rate is inflated by visitors and the night-time economy relative to its resident population, so it overstates the risk to residents.

Can a typical earner buy?

Terraced house Birmingham Camden
Median full-time pay £35,989 £53,133
House price ÷ pay 6.1× 30.1×
Median pay as a share of income typically needed to buy 82% 17%
Rent a year as a share of median pay 37% 77%

Buying, by property type

Type Birmingham Camden Difference
Terraced £220,000 £1,600,000 +627% in Camden
Flat £145,000 £649,500 +348% in Camden

Renting, by property type

Type (average rent a month) Birmingham Camden Difference
Terraced £1,095 £3,430 +213% in Camden
Flat £919 £2,407 +162% in Camden

Crime

Police recorded 114.2 crimes per 1,000 residents in Birmingham and 173.3 in Camden, so recorded crime per resident is 52% higher in Camden.

Police recorded crime per 1,000 residents Birmingham Camden Difference
All recorded crime (excluding fraud) 114.2 173.3 +52% in Camden
Violence against the person 46.1 34.4 -26% in Camden
Sexual offences 4.8 4.4 -10% in Camden
Robbery 3.1 6.5 +105% in Camden
Residential burglary (per 1,000 households) 11.7 11.9 +2% in Camden
Vehicle offences 10.2 10.1 -1% in Camden
Theft from the person 1.3 27.8 +2122% in Camden
Criminal damage and arson 9.1 7.8 -14% in Camden

Rates use resident population, so city centres and student areas show higher crime per resident than residents experience. Recorded crime also depends on reporting and police recording practice.

How prices have changed in each area

Average house price for all property types, indexed so that 2005 is 100. A line at 200 means prices have doubled.

Birmingham: 179Camden: 230
House prices in Birmingham and Camden since 2005, indexed so that 2005 is 100Prices indexed to 2005 = 100. Birmingham now 179, Camden now 230.5010015020025020052010201520202025House prices in Birmingham and Camden since 2005, indexed so that 2005 is 100Prices indexed to 2005 = 100. Birmingham now 179, Camden now 230.5010015020025020102020
Show the figures
YearBirminghamCamden
2005100100
2006104107
2007109127
2008105136
200995123
2010100139
201197151
201298159
2013100181
2014106205
2015111214
2016120219
2017129228
2018136229
2019140230
2020142226
2021157228
2022172234
2023174232
2024174232
2025178237
12 months to July 2026179230

In 2005 the average home cost £130,237 in Birmingham and £364,819 in Camden. Now it is £232,548 and £837,421: Birmingham is up 79% and Camden is up 130%. Prices have risen faster in Camden, so the gap between the two has widened.

Buying a home against local pay, over time

Average house price divided by median full-time pay. Higher means harder to afford.

Birmingham: 6.5 years of payCamden: 16.3 years of pay
Years of median pay needed to buy the average home in Birmingham and CamdenBirmingham now 6.5, Camden now 16.3 years of pay.0×5×10×15×20×20052010201520202025Years of median pay needed to buy the average home in Birmingham and CamdenBirmingham now 6.5, Camden now 16.3 years of pay.0×5×10×15×20×20052010201520202025
Show the figures
YearBirminghamCamden
20056.1 years of pay11.7 years of pay
20105.5 years of pay14.0 years of pay
20155.8 years of pay19.6 years of pay
20206.3 years of pay19.7 years of pay
20256.5 years of pay16.3 years of pay

In 2005 a home cost 6.1 years of pay in Birmingham and 11.7 years in Camden. In 2025 it was 6.5 years and 16.3 years.

Affordability has worsened more in Camden over that time.

How rents have changed in each area

Average monthly rent for all property types, indexed so that 2015 is 100.

Birmingham: 161Camden: 132
Rents in Birmingham and Camden since 2015, indexed so that 2015 is 100Rents indexed to 2015 = 100. Birmingham now 161, Camden now 132.80100120140160180201620182020202220242026Rents in Birmingham and Camden since 2015, indexed so that 2015 is 100Rents indexed to 2015 = 100. Birmingham now 161, Camden now 132.80100120140160180201520202025
Show the figures
YearBirminghamCamden
2015100100
2016105100
2017108100
201811199
2019113106
2020116101
202111897
2022122100
2023132111
2024147119
2025156131
August 2026161132

In 2015 the average rent was £682 a month in Birmingham and £2,134 in Camden. Now it is £1,099 and £2,819: up 61% in Birmingham and up 32% in Camden. Rents have risen faster in Birmingham.

What your salary is worth in each area

Salary needed to afford the same kind of home (terraced), going by median prices and average rents.

Moving from Birmingham to Camden

Earning in Birmingham Equivalent to buy in Camden Equivalent to rent in Camden
£30,000 £218,000 £94,000
£40,000 £291,000 £125,500
£50,000 £363,500 £156,500
£60,000 £436,500 £188,000

Moving from Camden to Birmingham

Earning in Camden Equivalent to buy in Birmingham Equivalent to rent in Birmingham
£30,000 £4,000 £9,500
£40,000 £5,500 £13,000
£50,000 £7,000 £16,000
£60,000 £8,500 £19,000
Prices are medians for each property type over the last 12 months of registered sales; types with fewer than 100 sales in either area are left out. Rents are ONS averages for the area. Pay is the median for full-time employees living in the area, before tax. Income needed is illustrative: it assumes a 10% deposit and a lender willing to lend 4.5 times income. Real lending depends on your circumstances. Salary equivalents compare housing costs only, not other living costs, tax or the pay you could earn in a new job.

All Birmingham figures · All Camden figures